Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Board › Firefly-RK3288› ACD301 Übungsmaterialien & ACD301 Lernführun ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] ACD301 Übungsmaterialien & ACD301 Lernführung: Appian Lead Developer &a

seanmar523

139

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
139

【General】 ACD301 Übungsmaterialien & ACD301 Lernführung: Appian Lead Developer &a

Posted at 14 hour before      View：6 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
Sie können im Internet teilweise die Fragenkataloge zur Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung von Fast2test kostenlos herunterladen. Dann würden Sie sich ganz gelassen auf Ihre Prüfung voebereiten. Wählen Sie die zielgerichteten Schulungsunterlagen, können Sie ganz leicht die Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen.
Appian ACD301 Prüfungsplan:
ThemaEinzelheiten
Thema 1
  • Proactively Design for Scalability and Performance: This section of the exam measures skills of Application Performance Engineers and covers building scalable applications and optimizing Appian components for performance. It includes planning load testing, diagnosing performance issues at the application level, and designing systems that can grow efficiently without sacrificing reliability.
Thema 2
  • Data Management: This section of the exam measures skills of Data Architects and covers analyzing, designing, and securing data models. Candidates must demonstrate an understanding of how to use Appian’s data fabric and manage data migrations. The focus is on ensuring performance in high-volume data environments, solving data-related issues, and implementing advanced database features effectively.
Thema 3
  • Extending Appian: This section of the exam measures skills of Integration Specialists and covers building and troubleshooting advanced integrations using connected systems and APIs. Candidates are expected to work with authentication, evaluate plug-ins, develop custom solutions when needed, and utilize document generation options to extend the platform’s capabilities.
Thema 4
  • Project and Resource Management: This section of the exam measures skills of Agile Project Leads and covers interpreting business requirements, recommending design options, and leading Agile teams through technical delivery. It also involves governance, and process standardization.

ACD301 Lernhilfe, ACD301 VorbereitungDie Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eigentlich eine Prüfung für die Technik-Experten. Die Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung kann den IT-Fachleuten helfen, eine bessere Berufskarriere zu haben. So können Sie dem Staat und Unternehmen große Gewinne bringen und die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung unseres Landes fördern. Wenn alle Fachleute das machen, ist unser Staat sicher reicher geworden. Unsere Schulungsunterlagen zur Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung können dieses Ziel der IT-Fachleute erreichen. Wir versprechen, dass Sie 100% die Prüfung bestehen können. Wenn Sie lange denken, ist es besser entschlossen eine Entscheidung zu treffen, die Schulungsunterlagen zur Appian ACD301 Zertifizierungsprüfung von Fast2test zu kaufen.
Appian Lead Developer ACD301 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q39-Q44):39. Frage
Your application contains a process model that is scheduled to run daily at a certain time, which kicks off a user input task to a specified user on the 1st time zone for morning data collection. The time zone is set to the (default) pm!timezone. In this situation, what does the pm!timezone reflect?
  • A. The time zone of the user who is completing the input task.
  • B. The time zone of the server where Appian is installed.
  • C. The default time zone for the environment as specified in the Administration Console.
  • D. The time zone of the user who most recently published the process model.
Antwort: C
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:In Appian, the pm!timezone variable is a process variable automatically available in process models, reflecting the time zone context for scheduled or time- based operations. Understanding its behavior is critical for scheduling tasks accurately, especially in scenarios like this where a process runs daily and assigns a user input task.
* Option C (The default time zone for the environment as specified in the Administration Console):
This is the correct answer. Per Appian's Process Model documentation, when a process model uses pm!
timezone and no custom time zone is explicitly set, it defaults to the environment's time zone configured in the Administration Console (under System > Time Zone settings). For scheduled processes, such as one running "daily at a certain time," Appian uses this default time zone to determine when the process triggers. In this case, the task assignment occurs based on the schedule, and pm!
timezone reflects the environment's setting, not the user's location.
* Option A (The time zone of the server where Appian is installed):This is incorrect. While the server' s time zone might influence underlying system operations, Appian abstracts this through the Administration Console's time zone setting. The pm!timezone variable aligns with the configured environment time zone, not the raw server setting.
* Option B (The time zone of the user who most recently published the process model):This is irrelevant. Publishing a process model does not tie pm!timezone to the publisher's time zone. Appian's scheduling is system-driven, not user-driven in this context.
* Option D (The time zone of the user who is completing the input task):This is also incorrect. While Appian can adjust task display times in the user interface to the assigned user's time zone (based on their profile settings), the pm!timezone in the process model reflects the environment's default time zone for scheduling purposes, not the assignee's.
For example, if the Administration Console is set to EST (Eastern Standard Time), the process will trigger daily at the specified time in EST, regardless of the assigned user's location. The "1st time zone" phrasing in the question appears to be a typo or miscommunication, but it doesn't change the fact that pm!timezone defaults to the environment setting.
References:Appian Documentation - Process Variables (pm!timezone), Appian Lead Developer Training - Process Scheduling and Time Zone Management, Administration Console Guide - System Settings.

40. Frage
You are just starting with a new team that has been working together on an application for months. They ask you to review some of their views that have been degrading in performance. The views are highly complex with hundreds of lines of SQL. What is the first step in troubleshooting the degradation?
  • A. Go through the entire database structure to obtain an overview, ensure you understand the business needs, and then normalize the tables to optimize performance.
  • B. Browse through the tables, note any tables that contain a large volume of null values, and work with your team to plan for table restructure.
  • C. Go through all of the tables one by one to identify which of the grouped by, ordered by, or joined keys are currently indexed.
  • D. Run an explain statement on the views, identify critical areas of improvement that can be remediated without business knowledge.
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:Troubleshooting performance degradation in complex SQL views within an Appian application requires a systematic approach. The views, described as having hundreds of lines of SQL, suggest potential issues with query execution, indexing, or join efficiency. As a new team member, the first step should focus on quickly identifying the root cause without overhauling the system prematurely. Appian's Performance Troubleshooting Guide and database optimization best practices provide the framework for this process.
* Option B (Run an explain statement on the views, identify critical areas of improvement that can be remediated without business knowledge):This is the recommended first step. Running an EXPLAIN statement (or equivalent, such as EXPLAIN PLAN in some databases) analyzes the query execution plan, revealing details like full table scans, missing indices, or inefficient joins. This technical analysis can identify immediate optimization opportunities (e.g., adding indices or rewriting subqueries) without requiring business input, allowing you to address low-hanging fruit quickly. Appian encourages using database tools to diagnose performance issues before involving stakeholders, making this a practical starting point as you familiarize yourself with the application.
* Option A (Go through the entire database structure to obtain an overview, ensure you understand the business needs, and then normalize the tables to optimize performance):This is too broad and time-consuming as a first step. Understanding business needs and normalizing tables are valuable but require collaboration with the team and stakeholders, delaying action. It's better suited for a later phase after initial technical analysis.
* Option C (Go through all of the tables one by one to identify which of the grouped by, ordered by, or joined keys are currently indexed):Manually checking indices is useful but inefficient without first knowing which queries are problematic. The EXPLAIN statement provides targeted insights into index usage, making it a more direct initial step than a manual table-by-table review.
* Option D (Browse through the tables, note any tables that contain a large volume of null values, and work with your team to plan for table restructure):Identifying null values and planning restructures is a long-term optimization strategy, not a first step. It requires team input and may not address the immediate performance degradation, which is better tackled with query-level diagnostics.
Starting with an EXPLAIN statement allows you to gather data-driven insights, align with Appian's performance troubleshooting methodology, and proceed with informed optimizations.
References:Appian Documentation - Performance Troubleshooting Guide, Appian Lead Developer Training
- Database Optimization, MySQL/PostgreSQL Documentation - EXPLAIN Statement.

41. Frage
You are required to configure a connection so that Jira can inform Appian when specific tickets change (using a webhook). Which three required steps will allow you to connect both systems?
  • A. Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials.
  • B. Create a Web API object and set up the correct security.
  • C. Give the service account system administrator privileges.
  • D. Create a new API Key and associate a service account.
  • E. Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status.
Antwort: A,B,D
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Configuring a webhook connection from Jira to Appian requires setting up a mechanism for Jira to push ticket change notifications to Appian in real-time. This involves creating an endpoint in Appian to receive the webhook and configuring Jira to send the data. Appian's Integration Best Practices and Web API documentation provide the framework for this process.
Option A (Create a Web API object and set up the correct security):
This is a required step. In Appian, a Web API object serves as the endpoint to receive incoming webhook requests from Jira. You must define the API structure (e.g., HTTP method, input parameters) and configure security (e.g., basic authentication, API key, or OAuth) to validate incoming requests. Appian recommends using a service account with appropriate permissions to ensure secure access, aligning with the need for a controlled webhook receiver.
Option B (Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials):
This is essential. In Jira, you need to set up a webhook by providing the Appian Web API's URL (e.g., https://<appian-site>/suite/webapi/<web-api-name>) and the credentials or authentication method (e.g., API key or basic auth) that match the security setup in Appian. This ensures Jira can successfully send ticket change events to Appian.
Option C (Create a new API Key and associate a service account):
This is necessary for secure authentication. Appian recommends using an API key tied to a service account for webhook integrations. The service account should have permissions to process the incoming data (e.g., write to a process or data store) but not excessive privileges. This step complements the Web API security setup and Jira configuration.
Option D (Give the service account system administrator privileges):
This is unnecessary and insecure. System administrator privileges grant broad access, which is overkill for a webhook integration. Appian's security best practices advocate for least-privilege principles, limiting the service account to the specific objects or actions needed (e.g., executing the Web API).
Option E (Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status):
This is incorrect for a webhook scenario. Webhooks are push-based, where Jira notifies Appian of changes. Creating an integration object for periodic polling (pull-based) is a different approach and not required for the stated requirement of Jira informing Appian via webhook.
These three steps (A, B, C) establish a secure, functional webhook connection without introducing unnecessary complexity or security risks.
Reference:
The three required steps that will allow you to connect both systems are:
A . Create a Web API object and set up the correct security. This will allow you to define an endpoint in Appian that can receive requests from Jira via webhook. You will also need to configure the security settings for the Web API object, such as authentication method, allowed origins, and access control.
B . Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials. This will allow you to set up a webhook in Jira that can send requests to Appian when specific tickets change. You will need to specify the URL of the Web API object in Appian, as well as any credentials required for authentication.
C . Create a new API Key and associate a service account. This will allow you to generate a unique token that can be used for authentication between Jira and Appian. You will also need to create a service account in Appian that has permissions to access or update data related to Jira tickets.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
D . Give the service account system administrator privileges. This is not required and could pose a security risk, as giving system administrator privileges to a service account could allow it to perform actions that are not related to Jira tickets, such as modifying system settings or accessing sensitive data.
E . Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status. This is not required and could cause unnecessary overhead, as creating an integration object from Appian to Jira would involve polling Jira for ticket status changes, which could consume more resources than using webhook notifications. Verified Reference: Appian Documentation, section "Web API" and "API Keys".

42. Frage
You are in a backlog refinement meeting with the development team and the product owner. You review a story for an integration involving a third-party system. A payload will be sent from the Appian system through the integration to the third-party system. The story is 21 points on a Fibonacci scale and requires development from your Appian team as well as technical resources from the third-party system. This item is crucial to your project's success. What are the two recommended steps to ensure this story can be developed effectively?
  • A. Break down the item into smaller stories.
  • B. Acquire testing steps from QA resources.
  • C. Maintain a communication schedule with the third-party resources.
  • D. Identify subject matter experts (SMEs) to perform user acceptance testing (UAT).
Antwort: A,C
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
This question involves a complex integration story rated at 21 points on the Fibonacci scale, indicating significant complexity and effort. Appian Lead Developer best practices emphasize effective collaboration, risk mitigation, and manageable development scopes for such scenarios. The two most critical steps are:
Option C (Maintain a communication schedule with the third-party resources):
Integrations with third-party systems require close coordination, as Appian developers depend on external teams for endpoint specifications, payload formats, authentication details, and testing support. Establishing a regular communication schedule ensures alignment on requirements, timelines, and issue resolution. Appian's Integration Best Practices documentation highlights the importance of proactive communication with external stakeholders to prevent delays and misunderstandings, especially for critical project components.
Option D (Break down the item into smaller stories):
A 21-point story is considered large by Agile standards (Fibonacci scale typically flags anything above 13 as complex). Appian's Agile Development Guide recommends decomposing large stories into smaller, independently deliverable pieces to reduce risk, improve testability, and enable iterative progress. For example, the integration could be split into tasks like designing the payload structure, building the integration object, and testing the connection-each manageable within a sprint. This approach aligns with the principle of delivering value incrementally while maintaining quality.
Option A (Acquire testing steps from QA resources): While QA involvement is valuable, this step is more relevant during the testing phase rather than backlog refinement or development preparation. It's not a primary step for ensuring effective development of the story.
Option B (Identify SMEs for UAT): User acceptance testing occurs after development, during the validation phase. Identifying SMEs is important but not a key step in ensuring the story is developed effectively during the refinement and coding stages.
By choosing C and D, you address both the external dependency (third-party coordination) and internal complexity (story size), ensuring a smoother development process for this critical integration.

43. Frage
You are the project lead for an Appian project with a supportive product owner and complex business requirements involving a customer management system. Each week, you notice the product owner becoming more irritated and not devoting as much time to the project, resulting in tickets becoming delayed due to a lack of involvement. Which two types of meetings should you schedule to address this issue?
  • A. An additional daily stand-up meeting to ensure you have more of the product owner's time.
  • B. A sprint retrospective with the product owner and development team to discuss team performance.
  • C. A meeting with the sponsor to discuss the product owner's performance and request a replacement.
  • D. A risk management meeting with your program manager to escalate the delayed tickets.
Antwort: B,D
Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:As an Appian Lead Developer, managing stakeholder engagement and ensuring smooth project progress are critical responsibilities. The scenario describes a product owner whose decreasing involvement is causing delays, which requires a proactive and collaborative approach rather than an immediate escalation to replacement. Let's analyze each option:
* A. An additional daily stand-up meeting: While daily stand-ups are a core Agile practice to align the team, adding another one specifically to secure the product owner's time is inefficient. Appian's Agile methodology (aligned with Scrum) emphasizes that stand-ups are for the development team to coordinate, not to force stakeholder availability. The product owner's irritation might increase with additional meetings, making this less effective.
* B. A risk management meeting with your program manager: This is a correct choice. Appian Lead Developer documentation highlights the importance of risk management in complex projects (e.g., customer management systems). Delays due to lack of product owner involvement constitute a project risk. Escalating this to the program manager ensures visibility and allows for strategic mitigation, such as resource reallocation or additional support, without directly confronting the product owner in a way that could damage the relationship. This aligns with Appian's project governance best practices.
* C. A sprint retrospective with the product owner and development team: This is also a correct choice.
The sprint retrospective, as per Appian's Agile guidelines, is a key ceremony to reflect on what's working and what isn't. Including the product owner fosters collaboration and provides a safe space to address their reduced involvement and its impact on ticket delays. It encourages team accountability and aligns with Appian's focus on continuous improvement in Agile development.
* D. A meeting with the sponsor to discuss the product owner's performance and request a replacement:
This is premature and not recommended as a first step. Appian's Lead Developer training emphasizes maintaining strong stakeholder relationships and resolving issues collaboratively before escalating to drastic measures like replacement. This option risksalienating the product owner and disrupting the project further, which contradicts Appian's stakeholder management principles.
Conclusion: The best approach combines B (risk management meeting) to address the immediate risk of delays with a higher-level escalation and C (sprint retrospective) to collaboratively resolve the product owner' s engagement issues. These align with Appian's Agile and leadership strategies for Lead Developers.
References:
* Appian Lead Developer Certification: Agile Project Management Module (Risk Management and Stakeholder Engagement).
* Appian Documentation: "Best Practices for Agile Development in Appian" (Sprint Retrospectives and Team Collaboration).

44. Frage
......
Unser Fast2test bietet erstklassige Informationsressourcen zur IT-Zertifizierung. In Fast2test können Sie die Lernhilfe sowie Lernmaterialien finden. Die Fragenkataloge zur Appian ACD301 Prüfung von Fast2test werden von den IT-Fachleuten langfristig nach ihren Erfahrungen und Kenntnissen bearbeitet. Unsere Fragenkataloge haben eine hohe Genauigkeit und starke Logik. Benutzen Sie beruhigt unsere Fragenkataloge zur Appian ACD301 Zertifizierung von Fast2test. Sie können sich ganz gut auf Ihre ACD301 Prüfung vorbereiten.
ACD301 Lernhilfe: https://de.fast2test.com/ACD301-premium-file.html
https://www.itcertmagic.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list