Open the auxiliary access

Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Firefly Open Source Community › Embedded Computer › Face X2› Reliable NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Vce ...
New Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Reliable NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Vce & NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Im

bobward215

131

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
131

【General】 Reliable NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Vce & NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Im

Posted at yesterday 09:53      View：16 | Replies：0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
2026 Latest DumpsKing NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer PDF Dumps and NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B52_LhtZ8YOCXxVheNafRdMo1b_1BmxH
These PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer (NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer) practice test covers all the topics of the NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer test and includes real NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer questions. If you are attempting the NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer examination for the first time, you will get an exact idea about the NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam and how you can clear it with flying colors. These PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Questions are available in desktop NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer practice exam software, web-based NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer practice test, and PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer (NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer) dumps pdf format.
PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Cybersecurity roles and responsibilities and risk management: This section measures the expertise of Security Leaders and Risk Managers in defining and managing cybersecurity roles and responsibilities. It also covers comprehensive risk management processes, including identifying, assessing, and mitigating cybersecurity risks in line with NIS 2 requirements.
Topic 2
  • Communication and awareness: This section covers skills of Communication Officers and Training Managers in developing and executing communication strategies and awareness programs. It emphasizes fostering cybersecurity awareness across the organization and effective internal and external communication during cybersecurity events or compliance activities.
Topic 3
  • Planning of NIS 2 Directive requirements implementation: This domain targets Project Managers and Implementation Specialists focusing on how to initiate and plan the rollout of NIS 2 Directive requirements. It includes using best practices and methodologies to align organizational processes and cybersecurity programs with the directive’s mandates.

100% Pass NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer - PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer Fantastic Reliable Exam VceContinuous improvement is a good thing. If you keep making progress and transcending yourself, you will harvest happiness and growth. The goal of our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer latest exam guide is prompting you to challenge your limitations. People always complain that they do nothing perfectly. The fact is that they never insist on one thing and give up quickly. Our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Study Dumps will assist you to overcome your shortcomings and become a persistent person. Once you have made up your minds to change, come to purchase our NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer training practice.
PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer Sample Questions (Q43-Q48):NEW QUESTION # 43
Scenario 3: Founded in 2001, SafePost is a prominent postal and courier company headquartered in Brussels, Belguim. Over the years, it has become a key player in the logistics and courier in the region. With more than 500 employees, the company prides itself on its efficient and reliable services, catering to individual and corporate clients. SafePost has recognized the importance of cybersecurity in an increasingly digital world and has taken significant steps to align its operations with regulatory directives, such as the NIS 2 Directive.
SafePost recognized the importance of thoroughly analyzing market forces and opportunities to inform its cybersecurity strategy. Hence, it selected an approach that enabled the analysis of market forces and opportunities in the four following areas: political, economic, social, and technological. The results of the analysis helped SafePost in anticipating emerging threats and aligning its security measures with the evolving landscape of the postal and courier industry.
To comply with the NIS 2 Directive requirements, SafePost has implemented comprehensive cybersecurity measures and procedures, which have been documented and communicated in training sessions. However, these procedures are used only on individual initiatives and have still not been implemented throughout the company. Furthermore, SafePost's risk management team has developed and approved several cybersecurity risk management measures to help the company minimize potential risks, protect customer data, and ensure business continuity.
Additionally, SafePost has developed a cybersecurity policy that contains guidelines and procedures for safeguarding digital assets, protecting sensitive data, and defining the roles and responsibilities of employees in maintaining security. This policy will help the company by providing a structured framework for identifying and mitigating cybersecurity risks, ensuring compliance with regulations, and fostering a culture of security awareness among employees, ultimately enhancing overall cybersecurity posture and reducing the likelihood of cyber incidents.
As SafePost continues to navigate the dynamic market forces and opportunities, it remains committed to upholding the highest standards of cybersecurity to safeguard the interests of its customers and maintain its position as a trusted leader in the postal and courier industry.
Based on scenario 3, what type of policy has SafePost established for protecting digital assets and maintaining security?
  • A. High-level general policy
  • B. High-level topic-specific policy
  • C. Topic-specific policy
Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 44
According to Article 7 of the NIS 2 Directive, what is one of the policies that Member States are required to adopt?
  • A. Supply chain cybersecurity policy
  • B. Disaster recovery planning policy
  • C. Physical access control policy
Answer: A

NEW QUESTION # 45
Scenario 1:
into incidents that could result in substantial material or non-material damage. When it comes to identifying and mitigating risks, the company has employed a standardized methodology. It conducts thorough risk identification processes across all operational levels, deploys mechanisms for early risk detection, and adopts a uniform framework to ensure a consistent and effective incident response. In alignment with its incident reporting plan, SecureTech reports on the initial stages of potential incidents, as well as after the successful mitigation or resolution of the incidents.
Moreover, SecureTech has recognized the dynamic nature of cybersecurity, understanding the rapid technological evolution. In response to the ever-evolving threats and to safeguard its operations, SecureTech took a proactive approach by implementing a comprehensive set of guidelines that encompass best practices, effectively safeguarding its systems, networks, and data against threats. The company invested heavily in cutting-edge threat detection and mitigation tools, which are continuously updated to tackle emerging vulnerabilities. Regular security audits and penetration tests are conducted by third-party experts to ensure robustness against potential breaches. The company also prioritizes the security of customers' sensitive information by employing encryption protocols, conducting regular security assessments, and integrating multi-factor authentication across its platforms.
According to scenario 1, SecureTech strongly emphasizes adopting a proactive cybersecurity approach, primarily focusing on preventing cyber threats before they escalate into incidents that could result in substantial material or non-material damage. Is this in alignment with the NIS 2 Directive?
  • A. No, this NIS 2 Directive focuses only on identifying and mitigating incidents rather than cyber threats
  • B. Yes, the NIS 2 Directive prioritizes proactive cybersecurity to prevent cyber threats from causing significant harm or damage.
  • C. No, the NIS 2 Directive strongly emphasizes adopting a reactive cybersecurity approach
Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 46
Scenario 2:
MHospital, founded in 2005 in Metropolis, has become a healthcare industry leader with over 2,000 dedicated employees known for its commitment to qualitative medical services and patient care innovation. With the rise of cyberattacks targeting healthcare institutions, MHospital acknowledged the need for a comprehensive cyber strategy to mitigate risks effectively and ensure patient safety and data security. Hence, it decided to implement the NIS 2 Directive requirements. To avoid creating additional processes that do not fit the company's context and culture, MHospital decided to integrate the Directive's requirements into its existing processes. To initiate the implementation of the Directive, the company decided to conduct a gap analysis to assess the current state of the cybersecurity measures against the requirements outlined in the NIS 2 Directive and then identify opportunities for closing the gap.
Recognizing the indispensable role of a computer security incident response team (CSIRT) in maintaining a secure network environment, MHospital empowers its CSIRT to conduct thorough penetration testing on the company's networks. This rigorous testing helps identify vulnerabilities with a potentially significant impact and enables the implementation of robust security measures. The CSIRT monitors threats and vulnerabilities at the national level and assists MHospital regarding real-time monitoring of their network and information systems. MHospital also conducts cooperative evaluations of security risks within essential supply chains for critical ICT services and systems. Collaborating with interested parties, it engages in the assessment of security risks, contributing to a collective effort to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector against cyber threats.
To ensure compliance with the NIS 2 Directive's reporting requirements, MHospital has streamlined its incident reporting process. In the event of a security incident, the company is committed to issuing an official notification within four days of identifying the incident to ensure that prompt actions are taken to mitigate the impact of incidents and maintain the integrity of patient data and healthcare operations. MHospital's dedication to implementing the NIS 2 Directive extends to cyber strategy and governance. The company has established robust cyber risk management and compliance protocols, aligning its cybersecurity initiatives with its overarching business objectives.
Based on scenario 2, are the cooperative evaluations of security risks carried out in alignment with Article 22 of the NIS 2 Directive?
  • A. No, cooperative evaluations should be done by the Cooperation Group, Commission, and ENISA
  • B. No, cooperative evaluations should be done by direct suppliers and service providers
  • C. Yes, cooperative evaluations are carried out in accordance with Article 22
Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 47
Scenario 8: FoodSafe Corporation is a well-known food manufacturing company in Vienna, Austria, which specializes in producing diverse products, from savory snacks to artisanal desserts. As the company operates in regulatory environment subject to this NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has employed a variety of techniques for cybersecurity testing to safeguard the integrity and security of its food production processes.
To conduct an effective vulnerability assessment process, FoodSafe Corporation utilizes a vulnerability assessment tool to discover vulnerabilities on network hosts such as servers and workstations. Additionally, FoodSafe Corporation has made a deliberate effort to define clear testing objectives and obtain top management approval during the discovery phase. This structured approach ensures that vulnerability assessments are conducted with clear objectives and that the management team is actively engaged and supports the assessment process, reinforcing the company's commitment to cybersecurity excellence.
In alignment with the NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has incorporated audits into its core activities, starting with an internal assessment followed by an additional audit conducted by its partners. To ensure the effectiveness of these audits, the company meticulously identified operational sectors, procedures, and policies. However, FoodSafe Corporation did not utilize an organized audit timetable as part of its internal compliance audit process. While FoodSafe's Corporation organizational chart does not clearly indicate the audit team's position, the internal audit process is well-structured. Auditors familiarize themselves with established policies and procedures to gain a comprehensive understanding of their workflow. They engage in discussions with employees further to enhance their insights, ensuring no critical details are overlooked.
Subsequently, FoodSafe Corporation's auditors generate a comprehensive report of findings, serving as the foundation for necessary changes and improvements within the company. Auditors also follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities and improvement opportunities.
The company recently expanded its offerings by adding new products and services, which had an impact on its cybersecurity program. This required the cybersecurity team to adapt and ensure that these additions were integrated securely into their existing framework. FoodSafe Corporation commitment to enhancing its monitoring and measurement processes to ensure product quality and operational efficiency. In doing so, the company carefully considers its target audience and selects suitable methods for reporting monitoring and measurement results. This incudes incorporating additional graphical elements and labeling of endpoints in their reports to provide a clearer and more intuitive representation of data, ultimately facilitating better decision-making within the organization.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following questions:
Which vulnerability assessment tool did FoodSafe Corporation use?
  • A. Database scans
  • B. Host-based scans
  • C. Network-based
Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 48
......
We update our PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam dumps over time and mark the changes online. Enroll in the PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer exam dumps and start your preparation with PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer practice questions. We will provide you with the information covered in the current test and incorporate materials that originate from PECB NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Dumps. You will get a handful of knowledge about topics that will benefit your professional career.
NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Dump: https://www.dumpsking.com/NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer-testking-dumps.html
What's more, part of that DumpsKing NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B52_LhtZ8YOCXxVheNafRdMo1b_1BmxH
https://www.actualtestsquiz.com
Reply

Use props Report

Return to List
High mode
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

  •  

Service Hotline : (+86)18688117175
Contact us
E-mail : global@t-firefly.com
Copyright © 2014-2022, FIREFLY TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD. All Rightts Reserved. 粤ICP备14022046号-2
Quick Reply Back to top Back to list