Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] Three Easy and User-Friendly TorrentExam The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam Question F

128

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
128

【General】 Three Easy and User-Friendly TorrentExam The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam Question F

Posted at 12 hour before      View:5 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! Download part of TorrentExam OGEA-103 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qsrajrI3GzkBqRdQxDlfxqxu63S-3XhK
One failure makes many candidates fall into despair, become unconfident or even someone want to give up testing for IT certification. Now OGEA-103 reliable practice exam online will help you out. It covers most real test questions and will assist you to clear exam certainly. You will be confident in your test. OGEA-103 reliable practice exam online will be an important choice for your The Open Group certification. Sometimes choice is greater than effort.
Part 1 of the exam covers the basics of the TOGAF framework, including key concepts and terminology, the ADM (Architecture Development Method), and the TOGAF reference models. It also covers the role of the architect within an organization and the importance of communication and stakeholder engagement throughout the architecture development process.
The OGEA-103 exam covers a broad range of topics related to enterprise architecture, including the TOGAF framework, architecture development methods, architecture content framework, and the enterprise continuum. It also covers the skills and knowledge required to implement and manage enterprise architecture projects, such as stakeholder management, governance, and architecture modeling. Passing the OGEA-103 Exam demonstrates that a candidate has a deep understanding of these topics and can apply them in real-world situations.
The Open Group OGEA-103 Exam Dumps - Achieve Better ResultsIf you purchase our OGEA-103 practice materials, we believe that your life will get better and better. You may find a better job with a higher salary or your company will give you a promotion on your OGEA-103 certification. So why still hesitate? Act now, join us, and buy our OGEA-103 Study Materials. You will feel very happy that you will be about to change well because of our OGEA-103 study guide.
The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam Sample Questions (Q29-Q34):NEW QUESTION # 29
Scenario
You are working as an Enterprise Architect within an Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a large government agency. The agency has multiple divisions.
The agency has a well-established EA practice and follows the TOGAF standard as its method for architecture development. Along with the EA program, the agency also uses various management frameworks, including business planning, project/portfolio management, and operations management. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO), who has actively promoted architecting with agility within the EA department as her preferred approach for projects.
The government has mandated that the agency prepare themselves for an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-first world, which they have called their "AI-first" plan. As a result, the agency is looking to determine the impact and role that AI will play moving forward. The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to look at how AI can be used for services across the agency. She has noted that digital platforms will be a priority for investment in order to scale the AI applications planned. Using AI to automate tasks and make things run smoother is seen as a big advantage. Process automation and improved efficiency from manual, repetitive activities have been identified as the key benefits of applying generative AI to their agency's business. This will include back-office automation, for example, for help center agents who receive hundreds of email inquiries. This should also improve services for citizens by making them more efficient and personalized, tailored to each individual's needs.
Many of the agency leaders are worried about relying too much on AI. Some leaders think their employees will need to learn new skills. Some employees are worried they might lose their jobs to AI. Other leaders worry about security and cyber resilience in the digital platforms needed for AI to be successful.
The leader of the Enterprise Architecture team has asked for your suggestions on how to address the concerns, and how to manage the risks of a new architecture for the AI-first project.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
  • A. You recommend creating an Organization Map to display the links between different parts of the agency. This will help the EA team to find and involve all areas of the agency impacted by this strategic change. Multiple business models should then be created that can be applied to AI-related projects. A meeting will be held with the stakeholders to teach them how to interpret the models and see how their concerns are being addressed. Risk will be managed as part of the Security Architecture development.
  • B. You recommend that the key stakeholders be formally identified. This should include those who will be most helpful for the change to be successful. A Communication Plan should be made to address their needs. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture based on stakeholder requirements and addressing concerns. You communicate with each key stakeholder to make sure their concerns are being addressed. You make sure that the architecture being developed clearly addresses risk management.
  • C. You recommend conducting an analysis of the stakeholders. This involves documenting the positions, concerns, issues, and cultural factors of each group. This information will shape how the architecture is to be presented and communicated. The concerns and relevant views can then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. The requirements for addressing risk should be recorded in the Architecture Requirements Specification and checked through regular assessments and feedback.
  • D. You recommend conducting an analysis that separates the different types of stakeholders into groups.They can be divided into categories: corporate functions, end-user organization, project team, external vendors, and external partners. A model will be developed for each stakeholder category to ensure that all the necessary information and actions are taken into account. Meetings will be arranged with stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been adequately addressed. Risk management will be included in this process.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The agency is initiating a strategic "AI-first" plan to transform processes using AI and improve efficiency while ensuring service improvements for citizens. Several stakeholder concerns have been raised, such as:
* Job security for employees.
* Skill development for adapting to new technologies.
* Cybersecurity and resilience risks due to reliance on digital platforms.
TOGAF emphasizes the importance of stakeholder management, communication, and risk management to ensure successful adoption and implementation of new architecture. These concerns need to be addressed methodically by gathering requirements, analyzing stakeholder positions, and ensuring proper communication of risks and benefits.
Option Analysis
Option A:
* Strengths:
* Proposes creating an Organization Map to identify the links between different parts of the agency and the impact of the strategic change.
* Suggests holding stakeholder meetings to address concerns.
* Includes managing risks as part of Security Architecture development.
* Weaknesses:
* Focusing solely on creating business models and teaching stakeholders how to interpret them does not directly address cultural and positional concerns about job loss, skill development, and security.
* Risk management is addressed as part of Security Architecture development but lacks broader integration into stakeholder requirements.
* Conclusion: Incorrect, as it fails to systematically document stakeholder concerns and map them into requirements and architecture decisions.
Option B:
* Strengths:
* Highlights the importance of formal stakeholder identification and creating a Communication Plan.
* Suggests addressing stakeholder concerns through communication and risk management.
* Weaknesses:
* Does not go into detail on analyzing stakeholder concerns, cultural positions, or specific requirements.
* Lacks the inclusion of stakeholder feedback in architecture artifacts like the Architecture Vision or Requirements Specification, which are critical TOGAF outputs.
* Conclusion: Incorrect, as it does not include a systematic and structured approach for stakeholder analysis and integration into architecture deliverables.
Option C:
* Strengths:
* Emphasizes conducting a thorough stakeholder analysis to document concerns, positions, and cultural factors, which aligns with TOGAF's approach in Phase A (Architecture Vision).
* Ensures stakeholder views and requirements are recorded in the Architecture Vision document and reflected in the Architecture Requirements Specification.
* Includes continuous assessment and feedback, ensuring concerns are addressed and risks managed effectively.
* Aligns with TOGAF's principle of involving stakeholders in architecture development to ensure alignment and success.
* Weaknesses:
* Could further detail how risk management is included across all phases, but this is implied through integration into the Architecture Requirements Specification.
* Conclusion: Correct, as it provides a structured and detailed approach for addressing stakeholder concerns and managing risks within TOGAF's framework.
Option D:
* Strengths:
* Suggests categorizing stakeholders into groups and creating models for each category.
* Proposes arranging meetings to verify that concerns have been addressed.
* Includes risk management as part of the process.
* Weaknesses:
* Dividing stakeholders into generic categories (e.g., corporate functions, project team) may not adequately capture specific cultural factors and concerns raised in the scenario.
* Lacks integration of stakeholder feedback into architecture deliverables such as the Architecture Vision and Architecture Requirements Specification.
* Conclusion: Incorrect, as it provides a generalized and less targeted approach to stakeholder concerns compared to Option C.
TOGAF References
* Stakeholder Management (Phase A): TOGAF emphasizes analyzing stakeholders' positions, concerns, and issues to shape architecture development and communication (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
* Architecture Vision: Captures high-level requirements and stakeholder views to ensure alignment with business goals (TOGAF 9.2, Section 6.2).
* Architecture Requirements Specification: Records detailed requirements, including those related to risk management, to guide the development of target architectures (TOGAF 9.2, Section 35.5).
* Iterative Feedback: Regular assessments and feedback loops are critical to ensure stakeholder concerns are addressed effectively throughout the ADM cycle.
By selecting Option C, the approach adheres to TOGAF's principles of stakeholder analysis, communication, and integration of concerns into architecture development.

NEW QUESTION # 30
Which of the following statements about architecture partitioning is correct?
  • A. Partitions reflect the organization's structure.
  • B. Partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture.
  • C. Partitions are equivalent to architecture levels.
  • D. Partitions are defined and assigned to agile Enterprise Architecture teams.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Based on the web search results, architecture partitioning is a technique that divides the Enterprise Architecture into smaller and manageable segments or groups, based on various classification criteria, such as subject matter, time, maturity, volatility, etc.12 Architecture partitioning is used to simplify the development and management of the Enterprise Architecture, by reducing complexity, improving governance, enhancing reusability, and increasing alignment and agility12. Therefore, the statement that partitions are used to simplify the management of the Enterprise Architecture is correct.
The other statements are incorrect because:
*         Partitions are not equivalent to architecture levels. Architecture levels are different layers of abstraction that describe the Enterprise Architecture from different perspectives, such as strategic, segment, and capability3. Partitions are subsets of architectures that are defined within or across the levels, based on specific criteria1.
*         Partitions do not necessarily reflect the organization's structure. The organization's structure is one possible criterion for partitioning the architecture, but it is not the only one. Other criteria, such as business function, product, service, geography, etc., can also be used to partition the architecture12.
*         Partitions are not defined and assigned to agile Enterprise Architecture teams. Agile Enterprise Architecture is an approach that applies agile principles and practices to the architecture work, such as iterative development, frequent feedback, adaptive planning, and continuous delivery4. Partitions are not a specific feature of agile Enterprise Architecture, but a general technique that can be applied to any architecture method or framework, including TOGAF12.

NEW QUESTION # 31
Complete the sentence Business Transformation Readiness Assessment is_________________.
  • A. a way to put building blocks into context thereby supporting re-usable solutions
  • B. a joint effort between corporate staff lines of business and IT planners
  • C. widely used to validate an architecture that is being developed
  • D. to ensure the active support of powerful stakeholders
Answer: B
Explanation:
Business Transformation Readiness Assessment is a joint effort between corporate staff lines of business and IT planners to evaluate the readiness of the organization to undergo change. It involves assessing factors such as vision, commitment, capacity, capability, culture, and motivation that may influence the success of a business transformation initiative. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.3.2 Business Transformation Readiness Assessment.

NEW QUESTION # 32
Scenario
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a technology company.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the sponsor of the activity. The EA practice uses an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision- makers to gain valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is the company's major asset and is highly confidential. The company employees travel a lot for work and need to communicate over public infrastructure. They use message encryption, secure internet connections using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and other standard security measures. The company has provided computer security awareness training for all its staff. However, despite good education and system security, there is still a need to rely on third-party suppliers for infrastructure and software.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education and support, the company could be a victim of a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their important data.
A risk assessment has been completed, and the company has looked for cyber insurance that covers ransomware. The price for this insurance is very high. The CTO recently saw a survey that said 1 out of 4 businesses that paid ransoms could not get their data back, and almost the same number were able to recover the data without paying. The CTO has decided not to get cyber insurance to cover ransom payment.
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to strengthen the current architecture to improve data protection.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?
  • A. You would assess business continuity requirements and analyze the current Enterprise Architecture for gaps. You would recommend changes to address the situation and create a change request. You would engage the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved, you would create a new Request for Architecture Work to begin an ADM cycle to implement the changes.
  • B. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's ability to respond to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.
  • C. You would monitor for technology updates from your existing suppliers that could enhance the company's capabilities to detect, react, and recover from an IT security incident. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
  • D. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised, you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The scenario highlights significant risks due to ransomware attacks and the need to strengthen the company's Enterprise Architecture to improve data protection and resilience. TOGAF emphasizes the Architecture Compliance Review as a mechanism for ensuring the architecture meets its objectives and addresses specific concerns such as security, resilience, and compliance with organizational goals.
The organization has already conducted a risk assessment but requires actionable steps to:
* Address ransomware attack risks.
* Increase the resilience of the Technology Architecture.
* Ensure proper alignment with governance and compliance frameworks.
Option Analysis
Option A:
* Strengths:
* Highlights the need for up-to-date processes for managing changes in the Enterprise Architecture.
* Recognizes the importance of governance through the Architecture Board and change management techniques.
* Weaknesses:
* The approach focuses solely on the Technology Architecture baseline but does not address the need for specific steps such as compliance review, gap analysis, or tailored resilience measures for ransomware risks.
* It provides a broad and generic approach rather than a targeted plan for ransomware and data protection issues.
* Conclusion: Incorrect. While it adheres to governance processes, it lacks specific actions to improve resilience and address the immediate security concerns.
Option B:
* Strengths:
* Proposes an Architecture Compliance Review, which is a core TOGAF process used to evaluate architecture implementation against defined objectives, ensuring it is fit for purpose.
* Involves identifying stakeholders (departments) and tailoring checklists specific to ransomware resilience.
* Emphasizes issue identification and resolution through structured review processes.
* Weaknesses:
* Does not explicitly address longer-term updates to the Enterprise Architecture, but this can be inferred as a next step following compliance recommendations.
* Conclusion: Correct. This is the most suitable approach based on TOGAF principles, as it uses an established process to evaluate and improve the architecture's resilience.
Option C:
* Strengths:
* Includes monitoring for updates from suppliers to enhance detection and recovery capabilities, which is relevant to addressing ransomware risks.
* Proposes a gap analysis to identify shortcomings in the current Enterprise Architecture and recommends addressing gaps through change requests.
* Incorporates disaster recovery planning exercises, which are useful for testing resilience.
* Weaknesses:
* While thorough, the approach lacks the Architecture Compliance Review process, which is a more structured way to ensure the architecture meets resilience requirements.
* Monitoring suppliers and running disaster recovery exercises are operational steps rather than strategic architectural improvements.
* Conclusion: Incorrect. While it includes valid activities, it does not adhere to TOGAF's structured approach for architecture assessment and compliance.
Option D:
* Strengths:
* Proposes analyzing business continuity requirements and assessing the architecture for gaps, which is relevant to the scenario.
* Suggests initiating an ADM cycle to address gaps, which aligns with TOGAF principles.
* Weaknesses:
* Focusing on initiating a new ADM cycle may be premature, as the immediate priority is to evaluate the existing architecture and address specific resilience concerns.
* Does not mention compliance review or tailored resilience measures for ransomware attacks, which are central to the scenario.
* Conclusion: Incorrect. It proposes a broader approach that may not adequately address the immediate concerns highlighted by the CSO.
TOGAF References
* Architecture Compliance Review: A structured process used to evaluate whether an architecture meets the stated goals, objectives, and requirements (TOGAF 9.2, Chapter 19). It is particularly useful for identifying and addressing resilience requirements in scenarios involving security risks.
* Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and involving stakeholders (e.g., departments) is a critical part of architecture governance and compliance review (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
* Change Management: The Architecture Compliance Review supports identifying necessary changes, which are then managed through governance and change management processes (TOGAF 9.2, Section
21.6).
By choosing Option B, you align with TOGAF's structured approach to compliance, resilience, and addressing security concerns.

NEW QUESTION # 33
Which section of the TOGAF template for Architecture Principles should highlight the business benefits of adhering to the principle?
  • A. Statement
  • B. Rationale
  • C. Implications
  • D. Name
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to the TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, the rationale section of the architecture principles template should highlight the business benefits of adhering to the principle, as well as the business risks of not adhering to it 1. The rationale section should explain the reasoning behind the principle, and provide evidence or arguments to support it. The rationale section should also link the principle to the business drivers, goals, and objectives of the enterprise, and show how the principle contributes to the value and success of the enterprise.
The other options are not correct, as they have different purposes in the architecture principles template. The name section should provide a short and memorable name for the principle, such as "Information is an Asset" or "Business Continuity" 1. The statement section should provide a concise and formal statement of the principle, such as "The enterprise's information is recognized as a core asset, and is managed accordingly" or
"The enterprise's ability to provide critical services and products must be maintained in the event of a disaster" 1. The implications section should identify the impact of the principle on the enterprise, such as the changes, costs, benefits, and risks that may result from applying or violating the principle 1. References: 1:
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 23: Architecture Principles, Section 23.3 Developing Architecture Principles.

NEW QUESTION # 34
......
They all got benefits from OGEA-103 certification and now they are OGEA-103 certification holders. You can also become part of this skilled and qualified community. To do this you just need to pass the The Open Group OGEA-103 certification exam. Are you ready for this? Do you want to become a TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam certified? If your answer is positive then we assure you that you are at the right place. Register yourself for TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam (OGEA-103) certification exam and download the TorrentExam OGEA-103 exam practice questions and start preparation right now.
OGEA-103 Valid Braindumps Book: https://www.torrentexam.com/OGEA-103-exam-latest-torrent.html
What's more, part of that TorrentExam OGEA-103 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qsrajrI3GzkBqRdQxDlfxqxu63S-3XhK
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list