Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] CT-UT Training Materials are Worthy for You to Buy It - RealVCE

132

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
132

【General】 CT-UT Training Materials are Worthy for You to Buy It - RealVCE

Posted at 12 hour before      View:4 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
BONUS!!! Download part of RealVCE CT-UT dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AeZO0N8rlQ2WHaSZ98NCr1XQ2Xqq0CCO
In the PDF version, the ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester (CT-UT) exam questions are printable and portable. You can take these ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester (CT-UT) pdf dumps anywhere and even take a printout of ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester (CT-UT) exam questions. The PDF version is mainly composed of real ISTQB CT-UT Exam Dumps. RealVCE updates regularly to improve its ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester (CT-UT) pdf questions and also makes changes when required.
It is widely accepted that where there is a will, there is a way; so to speak, a man who has a settled purpose will surely succeed. To obtain the CT-UT certificate is a wonderful and rapid way to advance your position in your career. In order to reach this goal of passing the CT-UT Exam, you need more external assistance to help yourself. With our CT-UT exam questions, you will not only get aid to gain your dreaming certification, but also you can enjoy the first-class service online.
Test CT-UT Testking, CT-UT Certification Book TorrentDuring the process of using our CT-UT study materials, you focus yourself on the exam bank within the given time, and we will refer to the real exam time to set your CT-UT practice time, which will make you feel the actual exam environment and build up confidence. Not only that you can get to know the real questins and answers of the CT-UT Exam, but also you can adjust yourself to the real pace of the CT-UT exam.
ISTQB CT-UT Exam Syllabus Topics:
TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Usability and Accessibility Standards: This part addresses the knowledge required by Compliance Officers regarding standards and guidelines that govern usability and accessibility. It introduces ISO standards like ISO 9241-110 and ISO 9241-171, manufacturer guidelines from major platforms, and web accessibility guidelines such as WCAG. It also touches on legislation relevant to accessibility requirements, such as the UK Equality Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Topic 2
  • Basic Concepts: This section measures the skills of Usability Analysts and covers fundamental definitions and ideas related to usability, user experience, and accessibility. It explains what usability means in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction within software products. User experience concepts related to emotions, perceptions, and responses before, during, and after use are included. It also addresses accessibility, focusing on usage by people with diverse abilities.
Topic 3
  • Usability Testing: This section measures the practical knowledge of Usability Testers in planning, conducting, analyzing, and reporting formal usability test sessions with users. It outlines test preparation activities including writing test plans, test scripts, and tasks, as well as considerations for test locations and pilot sessions. It explains how to moderate sessions, analyze findings, classify problems by severity, and communicate results effectively to stakeholders.
Topic 4
  • Usability Reviews: This domain evaluates the skills of Usability Testers in conducting reviews of software interfaces without user involvement. It differentiates informal reviews from expert reviews and introduces heuristic evaluation as a structured method. The section describes step-by-step approaches to preparing for and conducting reviews, emphasizing the importance of consensus and clear communication of findings.
Topic 5
  • User Surveys: This part assesses the ability of Usability Test Analysts to design and use surveys to gather user feedback on software usability. It describes how to prepare user surveys, select appropriate questionnaires, and analyze survey responses to measure user satisfaction and other quality attributes from the user’s perspective.

ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester Sample Questions (Q24-Q29):NEW QUESTION # 24
Which of the following statements about usability test plans is true?
  • A. It contains a schedule
  • B. It should be very elaborate and at least 10 pages
  • C. It contains the results of the test sessions
  • D. It should contain the briefing instructions
Answer: A
Explanation:
A usability test plan is a foundational document created before conducting usability testing. It outlines the objectives, scope, methodology, participants, tasks, and schedule for the testing activities. One of its essential components is the schedule, which details when and how test sessions will occur to ensure proper resource allocation and time management. Including a schedule helps coordinate between test moderators, participants, observers, and stakeholders, making the testing process organized and efficient.
While briefing instructions (Option B) may be related to the usability test, they are typically documented separately or included in participant materials rather than the formal test plan itself. The test plan should be concise and focused; it need not be overly elaborate or lengthy (Option C), as clarity and usability of the plan are more important than length. The results of the test sessions (Option D) are not included in the test plan but rather compiled afterward in a test report or analysis document.
Therefore, the correct statement is that the usability test plan contains a schedule, ensuring a structured timeline for the usability testing activities.
References:
Usability.gov, Usability Testing Plan Template
Nielsen Norman Group, Usability Test Planning
ISO 9241-210:2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Usability testing process

NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following is the highest WCAG conformance level, promising the most accessible content?
  • A. Triple A (AAA)
  • B. Double A (AA)
  • C. Quadruple A (AAAA)
  • D. Single A (A)
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) define three levels of conformance for web content accessibility:
Level A (Single A) is the minimum level of compliance.
Level AA (Double A) is the standard recommended for most websites, balancing accessibility and design.
Level AAA (Triple A) is the highest and most comprehensive level of accessibility, covering the widest range of needs.
There is no such level as "Quadruple A (AAAA)," making option D invalid.
Thus, WCAG Triple A (AAA) promises the most accessible content, even though it may not always be practically achievable for all types of content.
References:
W3C: WCAG 2.1 Conformance Requirements
ISO/IEC 40500:2012 (WCAG 2.0)
W3C: How to Meet WCAG
#######################################################

NEW QUESTION # 26
You're asked to evaluate the direct interaction between ordinary users and the software product. Which kinds of evaluations would be suited for that?
  • A. Accessibility evaluation
  • B. Risk assessment
  • C. Usability evaluation
  • D. Usability maturity assessment
Answer: C
Explanation:
A usability evaluation is specifically designed to assess how real users interact with a software product. It focuses on effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction in completing tasks. This may involve usability testing, expert reviews, or heuristic evaluations. The goal is to identify any usability problems and understand user behavior during real use.
Option A (Accessibility evaluation) targets inclusivity for users with disabilities, not general user interaction.
Option B (Usability maturity assessment) evaluates the organization's usability practices, and Option C (Risk assessment) evaluates potential project or system risks. Only option D directly involves observing and measuring user interaction.
References:
ISO 9241-11:2018 - Usability Definitions and Concepts
Usability.gov: Usability Evaluation Basics
Nielsen Norman Group: Types of Usability Evaluations
#######################################################

NEW QUESTION # 27
A large customer complained that a business application developed by your company sometimes transfers the wrong amount of money to clients, although there are no complaints of the actual users. The expected amount differs from the actually transferred amount by a factor of 10 or 100. After analyzing the log files, you found out that the application itself works fine. The problem seems to be caused by confusing text fields and labels for the decimal place, leading to user errors.
Which usability risk should be reasonably addressed for the next release?
  • A. Users resist using a software product which is essential for their daily work because it lacks usability
  • B. Users won't buy or use the software product because it lacks effectiveness, efficiency or satisfaction
  • C. Increased liability through risk to financial loss caused by a poorly designed or deceptive user interface
  • D. Users buy the software product but repeatedly need to call support because they don't understand how to use it
Answer: C
Explanation:
The scenario describes a situation where the interface misleads users into making serious financial mistakes due to poor design, such as confusing decimal separators. Even though the system functions correctly, it facilitates critical user errors. This constitutes a major usability risk with potential legal and financial consequences. Therefore, the correct risk to address is increased liability due to financial loss caused by a poorly designed or deceptive interface (option D). The other options focus on usability-related dissatisfaction, resistance, or lack of adoption, which are not the key concern in this scenario.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Risk Management in Usability Engineering
Nielsen Norman Group: Error Prevention in UI Design
IEEE 1028: Standard for Software Reviews and Risk-Based Usability
#######################################################

NEW QUESTION # 28
You are asked to evaluate the usability of a software application for a law firm. Due to time and budget constraints, it is not possible to include users in the evaluation process.
Which of the following is a valid approach for evaluating the usability in this case?
  • A. User surveys
  • B. Usability Review
  • C. Accessibility Evaluation
  • D. Usability testing
Answer: B
Explanation:
When actual users cannot be included, a usability review (often an expert or heuristic evaluation) is the most practical method. Trained evaluators examine the interface against usability principles and standards to identify potential issues. Surveys require user input, and usability testing cannot proceed without users.
Accessibility evaluation targets inclusivity for users with impairments, which is related but not a substitute for overall usability evaluation. Therefore, option A is the only valid method under these constraints.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Heuristic Evaluation
Usability.gov: Expert Reviews and Inspections
ISO 9241-110 - Usability Principles

NEW QUESTION # 29
......
Passing CT-UT certification can help you realize your dreams. If you buy our product, we will provide you with the best CT-UT study materials and it can help you obtain CT-UT certification. Our CT-UT exam braindump is of high quality and our service is perfect. With our proved data from our loyal customers that the pass rate of our CT-UT Practice Engine is as high as 99% to 100%. Your success is insured with our excellent CT-UT training questions.
Test CT-UT Testking: https://www.realvce.com/CT-UT_free-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of RealVCE CT-UT dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AeZO0N8rlQ2WHaSZ98NCr1XQ2Xqq0CCO
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list