Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] ユニーク-100%合格率のL5M1模擬解説集試験-試験の準備方法L5M1対応問題集

133

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
133

【General】 ユニーク-100%合格率のL5M1模擬解説集試験-試験の準備方法L5M1対応問題集

Posted at yesterday 19:30      View:14 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
2026年Japancertの最新L5M1 PDFダンプおよびL5M1試験エンジンの無料共有:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uTO3fJXxc61TrMaJwy6NLyKCJhOJrKhE
弊社のCIPSのL5M1勉強資料を利用したら、きっと試験を受けるための時間とお金を節約できます。JapancertのCIPSのL5M1問題集を買う前に、一部の問題と解答を無料にダウンロードすることができます。PDFのバージョンとソフトウェアのバージョンがありますから、ソフトウェアのバージョンを必要としたら、弊社のカスタマーサービススタッフから取得してください。
L5M1試験資料の更新は1年以内に無料で提供され、1年後にクライアントは50%の割引を受けることができます。古いクライアントは、L5M1のCIPS試験トレントを購入すると、特定の割引を利用できます。当社の専門家は、テストバンクの更新が毎日あるかどうかを確認し、L5M1学習ガイドの更新版がある場合、システムはそれを自動的にクライアントに送信します。それが、L5M1学習教材が非常に人気がある理由の1つであり、お客様により有利な価格とより多くのサービスを提供しています。
有難いL5M1模擬解説集 & 合格スムーズL5M1対応問題集 | 便利なL5M1関連復習問題集 Managing Teams and Individuals弊社のサイトは受験生の皆さんにさまざまな高品質の商品を提供できます。あなたはL5M1試験に参加する予定があると、弊社の無料な試用版のL5M1問題と回答を使用してみることができます。それでは、この問題集はあなたに適用するかどうかを確認した後、購入することを決定します。Japancert L5M1問題集を使って試験に合格しない場合に、当社は全額返金できます。
CIPS Managing Teams and Individuals 認定 L5M1 試験問題 (Q31-Q36):質問 # 31
What is meant by 'alienation' at work? (5 points). Describe 5 factors which can cause this (20 points).
正解:
解説:
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Definition (5 points):
Alienation at work refers to a state where employees feel disconnected, powerless, or estranged from their job, their colleagues, or the organisation. The concept, linked to Karl Marx's theory, highlights situations where workers feel that they have little control, little purpose, and no personal fulfilment in their role. Alienation often leads to low motivation, disengagement, and reduced productivity.
Five Factors that Cause Alienation (20 points):
Repetitive and monotonous work - Jobs that involve the same routine tasks every day can make employees feel like "cogs in a machine." For example, a procurement clerk only processing invoices with no involvement in decision-making may quickly feel alienated.
Lack of autonomy - When employees have no control over how they do their work, they feel powerless. In procurement, if buyers must follow rigid procedures without input into strategy, they may feel disengaged.
Poor leadership and communication - Alienation grows when managers fail to involve employees, communicate decisions, or provide feedback. Staff may feel undervalued and excluded from organisational goals.
Weak connection to organisational purpose - If employees cannot see how their work contributes to wider goals or society, they may feel their role lacks meaning. For instance, working in a cost-cutting environment without recognition of social value or sustainability can reduce motivation.
Lack of recognition or development opportunities - When employees feel their contributions are ignored, or they see no path for growth, they disengage. In procurement, failing to recognise successful negotiations or not offering training can create a sense of alienation.
Conclusion:
Alienation occurs when employees feel disconnected from their work, leading to low morale and performance. It can be caused by repetitive tasks, lack of autonomy, poor leadership, absence of purpose, and lack of recognition. For managers, reducing alienation means creating meaningful work, involving employees in decisions, and supporting development, which leads to higher engagement and productivity in procurement and supply functions.

質問 # 32
(Explain 5 different metaphors that can be used to describe an organisation)
正解:
解説:
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Organisations can be understood in many different ways through metaphors, which help managers and leaders interpret behaviour, culture and performance. Morgan's metaphors are widely used to explain these perspectives. Five key metaphors are explained below.
The first metaphor is the organisation as a machine. Here the business is seen like a well-oiled mechanism with standardised processes, clear rules, hierarchy and repeatable outputs. This works well for efficiency and control, for example in a procurement shared services function, but can be rigid and demotivating if flexibility and creativity are required.
The second is the organisation as an organism. This views the business as a living system that must adapt to its environment. Structures, processes and leadership styles must "fit" the context, whether technological, market-driven or human needs. In procurement, this could be seen when category teams adapt to sudden supply market changes, showing flexibility to survive in a dynamic environment.
The third is the organisation as a brain. This emphasises learning, feedback loops, and knowledge-sharing, where continuous improvement and innovation are central. Leaders encourage collaboration, reflection and data-driven decision-making. For procurement, this might be using spend analytics, lessons learned from supplier negotiations, and knowledge sharing across teams to improve sourcing strategies.
The fourth metaphor is the organisation as a culture. This highlights the shared values, beliefs and rituals that shape "how things are done." Leadership here involves role-modelling behaviours, building ethical cultures, and maintaining consistency between words and actions. In procurement, culture may show through an organisation's commitment to ethical sourcing, sustainability, and supplier diversity.
Finally, the organisation as a political system sees it as an arena of power and influence where decisions are made through negotiation, persuasion and coalition-building. Managers must understand power bases and stakeholder interests. In procurement, for instance, winning senior approval for a sourcing strategy may require influencing finance, operations, and CSR teams with different agendas.
In summary, each metaphor offers insights into how organisations function. The machine focuses on control, the organism on adaptability, the brain on learning, the culture on shared values, and the political system on power and influence. Good leaders in procurement should recognise that all these metaphors may apply in different situations, and use them to manage individuals and teams more effectively.

質問 # 33
What is meant by the 'systems approach' and 'contingency approach' to management? (20 points)
正解:
解説:
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Theories of management provide different ways of understanding how organisations can be led effectively. Two important perspectives are the systems approach and the contingency approach. Both move beyond early "one best way" classical theories and instead highlight the complexity and adaptability required in modern organisations.
The systems approach views the organisation as an integrated whole made up of interdependent subsystems such as HR, finance, operations and procurement. It is based on systems theory, seeing organisations as "open systems" that interact with their external environment. Inputs such as people, information and resources are transformed into outputs such as products, services and stakeholder value. Feedback loops are essential to monitor performance and make adjustments. The key idea is synergy - the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. For example, in procurement, sourcing decisions influence not only supplier performance but also finance (budgets), operations (continuity), and CSR (sustainability). A systems approach ensures that procurement strategies are aligned to wider organisational goals and continuous improvement.
The contingency approach develops this idea further, arguing that there is no universal way to manage. Instead, the best approach depends on situational factors such as environment, size, technology, or workforce capability. It rejects "one-size-fits-all" rules and stresses that management must adapt. For example, in a stable market, a hierarchical structure with formal rules may work well, whereas in volatile markets, flexible and decentralised decision-making is more effective. In procurement, this could mean using strict process controls for routine, low-value items, but adopting agile, collaborative approaches when managing strategic supplier partnerships in uncertain global supply chains.
In comparison, the systems approach gives managers a holistic view of how different parts of the organisation connect and interact with the external environment, while the contingency approach emphasises adaptability and situational leadership. Together, they suggest that effective managers need both a broad systems perspective and the ability to tailor their approach depending on context.
In conclusion, the systems approach stresses coordination, integration and feedback across the organisation, while the contingency approach stresses flexibility and the idea that "it depends." Both are highly relevant to procurement and supply leaders who must integrate across functions and adapt strategies to dynamic and uncertain supply environments.

質問 # 34
What is the 'human relations' approach to management? (20 points)
正解:
解説:
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
The human relations approach to management developed in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also by social needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.
The foundation of this school came from the Hawthorne Studies (Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.
Key principles of the human relations approach include:
Focus on people rather than just processes - recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.
Motivation through recognition and belonging - linking to theories such as Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Herzberg's motivators.
Leadership style matters - supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.
Team dynamics are critical - informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.
Job satisfaction drives performance - happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal.
Advantages of the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.
Disadvantages include the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through "false concern." It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.
In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.
In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.

質問 # 35
Caleb is the newly appointed CEO of Star Fish Limited, a company that manufactures and installs gym equipment. The company employs 100 people and has dedicated teams for Finance, Product Development and Procurement. Some staff work from the office and some staff work remotely from home. Contrast and provide an example of a formal and informal group that may form at this organisation. What factors should Caleb be aware of that can contribute to group formations? (25 points)
正解:
解説:
See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Formal vs Informal Groups (10-12 marks):
Formal groups are those deliberately created by management to achieve organisational objectives. They have defined structures, roles, and reporting lines. In Star Fish Ltd, examples include the Procurement Team, responsible for sourcing suppliers and managing contracts. This group has clear goals, formal leadership, and measurable outputs.
By contrast, informal groups arise naturally among employees based on social interactions, common interests, or personal relationships. They are not officially sanctioned but strongly influence behaviour. At Star Fish Ltd, an example could be a fitness club of employees who exercise together during breaks or a WhatsApp group among remote workers who support each other socially. These groups provide belonging and morale but may also resist management decisions if excluded.
Factors Influencing Group Formation (12-15 marks):
Common goals and tasks - People working on shared objectives, such as the Product Development Team working on new gym equipment, naturally form groups.
Geography and work arrangements - Staff working remotely may form virtual support groups, while office-based staff bond more through daily interactions.
Shared interests and values - Employees passionate about fitness or sustainability may form informal networks within the company.
Friendship and social needs - Based on Maslow's hierarchy, people seek belonging. Friendships often develop into informal groups.
Leadership and influence - Charismatic or respected individuals may attract followers, leading to informal group formation around their personality.
Organisational culture - A collaborative culture encourages group formation for teamwork, while a competitive culture may create cliques or rival groups.
Technology and communication platforms - With remote work, online groups (Teams, Slack, WhatsApp) facilitate informal interaction and knowledge sharing.
Conclusion:
At Star Fish Ltd, formal groups like the Procurement Department are designed to deliver organisational objectives, while informal groups such as fitness clubs or virtual chat groups form naturally. Caleb must recognise that both types of groups are powerful. Formal groups deliver results, but informal groups influence morale, motivation, and resistance to change. By understanding the factors driving group formation, Caleb can harness both to build cohesion, encourage collaboration, and support the organisation's success.

質問 # 36
......
多くの人々は、ある分野での仕事に秀でることができ、知識をある産業での実際の仕事に応用するのに熟練した有能な人になりたいと思っています。しかし、彼らにとっては簡単なことではなく、目標を達成するために多くの努力が必要です。テストL5M1認定に合格すると、彼らはそのような人々になります。あなたが彼らの1人であれば、L5M1学習教材を購入することで、少ない労力でスムーズにテストに合格できます。 L5M1試験の質問は価値があり、有用です。当社の製品を購入すると、最高のサービスを提供して満足することができます。
L5M1対応問題集: https://www.japancert.com/L5M1.html
CIPSのL5M1認証試験に関する訓練は対応性のテストで君を助けることができて、試験の前に十分の準備をさしあげます、CIPS L5M1模擬解説集 そのため、メールアドレスにメールを送信することをお勧めします、CIPSのL5M1認定試験を一回合格するためには必ず良い準備しなければなりません、通常、あなたは新人でもプロフェッショナルでも、他の本を学習する必要がなく、最新のL5M1テストガイド資料を覚えるだけ、きっと試験に合格できます、CIPS L5M1模擬解説集 1200の質問を勉強するのは非常に難しい、時間を無駄にすることです、そして、L5M1試験の質問で20〜30時間学習Managing Teams and Individualsした後にのみ、L5M1試験に合格することができます。
挿れて、咲夜さくや ん、上田さんはしっかりしているから、CIPSのL5M1認証試験に関する訓練は対応性のテストで君を助けることができて、試験の前に十分の準備をさしあげます、そのため、メールアドレスにメールを送信することをお勧めします。
L5M1 試験3回目にして合格した僕がおすすめする参考書はこれ JapancertCIPSのL5M1認定試験を一回合格するためには必ず良い準備しなければなりません、通常、あなたは新人でもプロフェッショナルでも、他の本を学習する必要がなく、最新のL5M1テストガイド資料を覚えるだけ、きっと試験に合格できます。
1200の質問を勉強するのは非常に難しい、時間を無駄にすることです。
ちなみに、Japancert L5M1の一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uTO3fJXxc61TrMaJwy6NLyKCJhOJrKhE
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list