Firefly Open Source Community

   Login   |   Register   |
New_Topic
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

[General] 試験の準備方法-実用的なInsuranceSuite-Analyst的中合格問題集試験-便利なInsuranceSuite-Analystテスト模擬問題集

137

Credits

0

Prestige

0

Contribution

registered members

Rank: 2

Credits
137

【General】 試験の準備方法-実用的なInsuranceSuite-Analyst的中合格問題集試験-便利なInsuranceSuite-Analystテスト模擬問題集

Posted at 5 hour before      View:18 | Replies:0        Print      Only Author   [Copy Link] 1#
さらに、CertJuken InsuranceSuite-Analystダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xq3547PeBaBcPQlBioDBExVFnjtjc_qR
恐いGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験をどうやって合格することを心配していますか。心配することはないよ、CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料がありますから。この資料を手に入れたら、全てのIT認証試験がたやすくなります。CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料はGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst認定試験のリーダーです。
当社のソフトウェアをダウンロードして30時間以内に練習する場合のみ、自信を持ってテストに参加できます。 InsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレントは期間限定の試験とオンラインエラー修正をシミュレートできるため、InsuranceSuite-Analyst試験の準備にかかる時間と労力は他の学習教材よりも少なくて済みます。 20時間または30時間を費やすだけでInsuranceSuite-Analyst証明書を手に入れることは非常に経済的です。これは通常、将来のキャリアにとって有益です。したがって、テストを準備するには、InsuranceSuite-Analystガイドトレントを購入するのが最善かつ賢明な選択です。
InsuranceSuite-Analystテスト模擬問題集 & InsuranceSuite-Analyst全真模擬試験CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料はPDF形式とソフトウェアの形式で提供します。私たちは最も新しくて、最も正確性の高いGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料を提供します。長年の努力を通じて、CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst認定試験の合格率が100パーセントになっていました。もし君はいささかな心配することがあるなら、あなたはうちの商品を購入する前に、CertJukenは無料でサンプルを提供することができます。
Guidewire Associate Certification - InsuranceSuite Analyst - Mammoth Proctored Exam 認定 InsuranceSuite-Analyst 試験問題 (Q49-Q54):質問 # 49
All of the following are characteristics of a good requirement except:
  • A. Feature
  • B. Traceable
  • C. Clear
  • D. Verifiable
正解:A
解説:
A well-written requirement in a Guidewire InsuranceSuite project should meet several quality criteria to ensure it can be successfully implemented and validated. The correct answer isOption A - Feature, as a feature is not a characteristic of a good requirement.
Good requirements areclear, meaning they are easy to understand and unambiguous. Clarity ensures that business analysts, developers, and testers interpret the requirement consistently. Requirements should also be verifiable, which means there must be a way to confirm through testing or inspection that the requirement has been met.
Another critical characteristic istraceability. Traceable requirements can be linked back to business objectives and forward to design elements, test cases, and implementation artifacts. Traceability is essential in regulated insurance environments and helps manage scope, changes, and audits.
Afeature, however, is not a quality attribute of a requirement. Features are collections of functionality or capabilities that may be delivered through one or more requirements. While requirements can describe aspects of a feature, being a "feature" does not describe how well a requirement is written.
Understanding these characteristics helps analysts produce higher-quality documentation that reduces rework, improves delivery predictability, and supports successful Guidewire implementations.

質問 # 50
A well-written and appropriately versioned requirements document is MORE likely to: choose two
  • A. Simplify change management for all stakeholders
  • B. Support traceability of requirements
  • C. Result in the development of a viable solution
  • D. Increase end-user satisfaction
正解:A、B
解説:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
In the context of the Guidewire methodology and general Business Analysis best practices, maintaining well- written (clear, atomic, uniquely identified) and versioned requirements provides specific process benefits:
* Support traceability of requirements (Option C):
Traceability is the ability to track a requirement from its origin (Business Goal) through to its implementation (User Story) and verification (Test Case). A "well-written" document assigns unique IDs to requirements, and
"versioning" ensures that you can trace a specific state of a requirement to a specific build or release. This ensures that the testing team validates the correct version of the logic.
* Simplify change management for all stakeholders (Option B):
Change Management relies on having a "Baseline." By strictly versioning requirements (e.g., v1.0 vs. v1.1), the project team can easily identify the "Delta" (what changed). This makes it significantly easier to assess the impact of a change on cost, timeline, and other system components. Without versioning, stakeholders cannot effectively manage scope creep or understand the history of decisions.
Why other options are less direct:
* D. Result in the development of a viable solution:While good requirementscontributeto a viable solution, a document can be perfectly written and versioned but still describe a solution that is too expensive or technically impossible. Viability depends onfeasibility analysis, not just document formatting.
* A. Increase end-user satisfaction:This is a derivative benefit. Users are satisfied by the working software, not the document itself.

質問 # 51
Please select Elaboration session best practice(s):
  • A. Focus on the client's current workflow in order to write requirements that define their current system
  • B. Don't suggest that something is out of scope
  • C. Don't allow multiple conversations to go on at the same time
  • D. Revisit decisions made in prior sessions
正解:C
解説:
Elaboration sessions are structured, collaborative workshops intended to validate requirements, align stakeholders, and refine user stories based on Guidewire out-of-the-box functionality. Following best practices ensures these sessions remain productive and value-focused.
A key best practice ispreventing multiple conversations from occurring at the same time(Option A). Side conversations reduce focus, create misalignment, and often result in missed decisions or conflicting outcomes.
A single-threaded discussion ensures all participants hear the same information and contribute effectively.
The other options contradict Guidewire elaboration best practices. Analystsshould suggest when something is out of scope(Option B) to protect delivery timelines and avoid scope creep. Revisiting decisions from prior sessions (Option C) undermines progress and should only occur if new, critical information emerges. Finally, focusing on the client's current workflow (Option D) leads to replicating legacy systems; Guidewire elaboration should emphasizefuture-state processesenabled by the product.

質問 # 52
Each Guidewire product has a set of ______________ that identify common processes within the product.
  • A. Application Guides (User Guides)
  • B. Themes
  • C. Configuration Guide
  • D. Backlog priorities
正解:B
解説:
Guidewire InsuranceSuite products are designed around a consistent set ofbusiness process patternsthat help analysts and implementation teams understand how functionality is organized and delivered. These common process patterns are identified throughthemes, makingOption Dthe correct answer.
Themesrepresent high-level groupings of related functionality within a Guidewire product. Examples include policy lifecycle management, claims handling, billing operations, and customer account management. Themes help analysts quickly understand how business processes map to Guidewire capabilities and provide a structured way to explore product functionality during elaboration and requirement definition.
Themes are particularly important during early project phases, such as Inception and Elaboration, because they provide aframework for organizing requirementsand discussions. By anchoring conversations around themes, analysts can ensure coverage of end-to-end processes and avoid missing critical functionality.
The other options do not serve this purpose. Application Guides (Option A) and Configuration Guides (Option C) are documentation artifacts, not mechanisms for identifying common processes. Backlog priorities (Option B) relate to Agile planning and do not describe product structure.
Understanding themes enables analysts to speak a common language with stakeholders and technical teams, ensuring that requirements align with Guidewire's product design and intended usage.

質問 # 53
A project team is considering rebuilding a complex claims calculation feature from their legacy system within the new Guidewire Cloud implementation, rather than leveraging the base InsuranceSuite functionality. Based on maximizing value principles, which two potential impacts are most likely to arise from this approach? (Choose two)
  • A. Increased maintenance responsibilities
  • B. Increased ease of future Guidewire updates
  • C. Reduced implementation effort and cost
  • D. Challenges with future Guidewire platform updates
  • E. Improved system performance compared to base configuration
正解:A、D
解説:
One of the core principles of Guidewire implementations-especially onGuidewire Cloud-is tomaximize value by leveraging base InsuranceSuite functionalityand minimizing custom development. Rebuilding complex legacy features typically introduces significant long-term risks.
A primary impact ischallenges with future Guidewire platform updates(Option B). Custom-built logic that diverges from standard Guidewire patterns may not be compatible with new releases, increasing the risk of upgrade failures, regressions, and extended downtime during upgrades.
Another likely impact isincreased maintenance responsibilities(Option D). Custom calculations must be maintained, tested, documented, and updated over time. This creates ongoing operational overhead and dependency on specialized technical knowledge.
The other options are unlikely outcomes. Custom rebuilding rarely improves performance over optimized base functionality (Option A). It almost always increases, rather than reduces, implementation effort and cost (Option C). Ease of future upgrades (Option E) is reduced, not improved.
From a value-driven perspective, analysts should encourage reuse of Guidewire's proven capabilities and only pursue customization when there is a clear, measurable business benefit that outweighs long-term cost and risk.

質問 # 54
......
CertJukenのウェブサイトをクリックしたら、CertJukenに登録した人々が非常にたくさんいることに驚いたでしょう。実はこれは普通なことです。CertJukenは毎日異なる受験生に様々なトレーニング資料を提供します。彼らは当社の資料を利用してから試験に受かりました。これは当社が提供したGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analystトレーニング資料が本当に効果的なものということを証明しました。もしあなたも試験に合格したいのなら、CertJukenをミスしないでください。CertJukenはきっとあなたのニーズを満たせますから。
InsuranceSuite-Analystテスト模擬問題集: https://www.certjuken.com/InsuranceSuite-Analyst-exam.html
Guidewire InsuranceSuite-Analyst的中合格問題集 参考のためにいくつかの利点を提供しています、ここで無料にCertJukenが提供したGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験の部分練習問題と解答をダウンロードできて、一度CertJukenを選ばれば、弊社は全力に貴方達の合格を頑張ります、あなたはInsuranceSuite-Analyst模擬問題集をご購入になってから、あとの一年間、我々は無料の更新サービスを提供して、お客様の持っているAssociate Certification - InsuranceSuite Analyst - Mammoth Proctored Exam模擬試験は最新のを保証します、CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料はIT認証試験を受ける全ての受験生が試験に合格することを助けるもので、受験生からの良い評価をたくさんもらいました、学習の過程で、InsuranceSuite-Analyst学習教材も効率を改善できます。
ははははっ、まあ、こんなとこで野暮な話は止めて、ゆっくり楽しんでかInsuranceSuite-Analystらでいいじゃないっすか そう言って入店を促すウエハラだが、ミサは足を動かさず、拒絶を示した、参考のためにいくつかの利点を提供しています。
実際的なInsuranceSuite-Analyst的中合格問題集 & 合格スムーズInsuranceSuite-Analystテスト模擬問題集 | 便利なInsuranceSuite-Analyst全真模擬試験ここで無料にCertJukenが提供したGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験の部分練習問題と解答をダウンロードできて、一度CertJukenを選ばれば、弊社は全力に貴方達の合格を頑張ります、あなたはInsuranceSuite-Analyst模擬問題集をご購入になってから、あとの一年間、我々は無料の更新サービスを提供して、お客様の持っているAssociate Certification - InsuranceSuite Analyst - Mammoth Proctored Exam模擬試験は最新のを保証します。
CertJukenのGuidewireのInsuranceSuite-Analyst試験トレーニング資料はIT認証試験を受ける全ての受験生が試験に合格することを助けるもので、受験生からの良い評価をたくさんもらいました、学習の過程で、InsuranceSuite-Analyst学習教材も効率を改善できます。
さらに、CertJuken InsuranceSuite-Analystダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xq3547PeBaBcPQlBioDBExVFnjtjc_qR
Reply

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register

This forum Credits Rules

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list